01 June 2010 ~ 7 Comments

To Typo or Not To Typo

Typo domain names are a curiosity in the web market. Domains are purchased with the aim in mind to grow their value via use online as a website url. But typo domains depend on a negative action to achieve their upside. Typing in a word they can’t quite remember, committing an error when spelling what they are typing into the address bar, or using a moniker for a longer term can result in some serious typo traffic.

This is especially true when the domain name is formed from a word that is hard to remember or the letters as they follow through the url word aren’t intuitively placed on a keyboard. the resulting error fixes a hit on the actual website domain url the mistyped word appears as. These types of domains get a sliver of the traffic actual destination domains do, but they derive significantly more traffic online than unpromoted site names.

The value of the educational practices of the global world at large is responsible for creating the world of typo domains and their associated resale market. Sometimes people are typing in a domain destination and they are distracted by a phone call or a conversation. Not everyone using a keyboard in today’s computer environment took formal typing courses. This yields a mainstream public of touch typists prone to errors.

The investment strategy for typo domains tends to fall into a cost per click analysis. This can mean the cost to the webmaster for each click that pays a profitable margin, or the cost per click to keep the website up and running. For a free parked page this cost per click is going to be much less than a constructed website. Unless the unwary domainer has fallen into the trap of the for-fee parked page.

Any profit model of development for a typo domain name should appreciate the interest the original correctly spelled domain name owner might feel about it. of course, the opportunity was always present for that domainer to have purchased close typos, a practice many experienced domainers know to do. Having typos of names a webmaster is intensely bringing to a launch is intelligent planning as it removes the risk of others from benefiting from your development effort.

Typo names have the benefit that can be created and purchased from a registrar at inception. So if a prominent new term or domain enters the SEO fray, an aggressive domainer can search the available names list or new name creation possibilities at a registrar and get the new. For this reason, aggressive domainers watch the traffic list and try to derive new typo names for resale to the typo domain market.

Surveying typo domain holders should be the practice of many big ticket name auction bidders. In the event of a resale campaign, the offers will be slim is this base is well covered.  Popular names so well known they are typed in are usually destinations like FaceBook, Twitter, etc. But typo domains can be place name typos like Duba.info for Dubai, a popular city in the Middle East.

Buyers of typo names are wise to review the unique visitors report, traffic volume over (seller) ownership and revenue from the name to date. this will qualify and underline any domain offer and start negotiation discussions that assume revenue will be constant or grow. The investment and short term gains and long money are about the same as the mainstream domain market except for really hot names and equally hot lawsuits pending.

Typo domains have their own subgenres and distinct buyers and sellers for certain types of typo names. Typo names from categories like generics, adult names, and other derivative in the keyword or domain word market. But some domaining experts warn domainers not to get into the typo domain market except for soundalikes of domains they already own.

Continue Reading

05 March 2010 ~ 0 Comments

Goog Smacked

DomainOwllogo

I was discussing the recent headlines regarding Google and typo names and for me the dominant term was PPC and typo, for him the dominant phrase was “$500 million”. That’s a planet full of money Google is raking in. What are they doing with it, exactly?

Typo traffic used to be a sideline for domain namers. Typos were names that sound like big names and popular online destinations. Domainers took a risk buying the names because you never knew when the dreaded C & D letter might arrive. But the sites would accrue traffic because humans have a tendency to misspell when working the address bar.

But $500 million is a lot of money to be changing hands without some whistles being blown. if the big money in domains has putatively transferred to an all-typo model, then get crackin’ regging those typos. Hand reg, main reg with your hosting company, or buy the typo from another domainer. See if typo domain markets are your domaining bag.

Kick the tires on a typo today and see what happens.

Continue Reading

03 March 2010 ~ 1 Comment

Screech Point

owlscreech1

Typos are Big PPC value, to the experienced domainer willing to risk their hosting account. Big meaning $500 million. Copyright jumping and typo squatting has been going on for some time, but the startling statistics used in this latest report reveal that Google is comfortable deriving PPC ad click revenue before the squatting pocket gets eviscerated.

Edelman and Moore allege that “for Google, typos may equal big business”. This is not news for domainers who have watched the auctions for years seeing trademark and copyright eligible names derived revenues, while other domainers receive prompt cease-and-desist letters.

So. The onus is domainers to behave morally, even when their compatriots are deriving hefty adsense and Google PPC revenues. If this the tone Google means to take with all their ventures? The researcher conclude  “That tells us that PPC funding is *causing* and *exacerbating* typo squatting”. This is serious news for domainers.

Is there a market for PPC revenue in domaining and page hosting related to exploited domain name value without a typo squat? Because if not, Google has a lot of explaining to do to verify their profit projection metrics. And critics of this research point to a  legal wrangle the authors of this report have had with Google.

Is there a witch hunt for Google? Or does the media online behemoth need some sharp and inquiring minds into their business practices? If Google is the next Microsoft, some changes should be made before they own the Internet. Or perhaps, according to some domainers, it’s already too late?

Continue Reading