I was speaking in consultation with a colleague today, and while going over the ideas for a new website I noticed a particular emphasis on the site design. I realized it had been so long since I had heard anyone fret about using a public template, or develop using overly customized code, or even properly launch conjunction sites, I was moved to mention it aloud.
It seems obvious to me by now that the whole dimension to designing a website has almost vanished as an aesthetic art and been wholly replaced by the architectural need to build an SEO capable site first and foremost. The site plan Google submission, the DMOZ listing, and the bots traveling over the site every day has become an outsize priority for every site.
Webmasters can see how link building, paid link exchanges and article submission have taken over the web. They can see this especially well when administrate the polyglot mixture if spam comments that flood the WordPress that are neither relevant nor grammatically formed into real sentences. The mechanized manual submission software many non-English speakers are using has a lot to answer for.
Bulklinking is the new sport of domainer kings. The bulk of a domain’s launch expenses and the main thrust of its establishment on the Internet frontier is a loud neon sign proclaiming its existence. Being able to seed your link in as many directories as possible has long been an SEO goal, but one of questionable theoretical relevance. i recognise this as afact of current web site commerce and many others do too.
My problem is the manner in which many mechanized software programs slam my websites with useless comments daily. I am not a machine and I have to delete these manually. I have one blog which has over 3,000 pointless links that make no sense with comments that are gibberish. The sentences are just random words. This is practically more time consuming to eliminate from my administration interface than an actual site hack.
What I believe should happen is that these linkers should be judged as the equivalent of spam and be treated as such. Their web hosting companies should be contacted. Spam sites and remailers and emails where spam email originally comes from is regularly reported to the site engines from downranking and eventual discounting of the site data. Spam commenters utilizing random assignment of comments to blogs and websites should suffer the same fate.
There should be a bulklinker database just like the universal spam list and the same sites who pay Rupees to cement innocent websites with layers of nonsense. Most of these comments have no relationship to any of the keywords for the sites concerned.There ca be no benefit whatsoever to their site and the link makes my site anonymously supporting junk site urls and seem relatively discounted form an SEO perspective.
Since I know which link directory websites I have added my sites to and which I have done nothing with, I can see how universal and inconsiderately applied some of these list additions are. Some of my websites have been targeted simply because someone thought I would be spending a fortune on affiliates or fraternal sites links and thought they’d hitch a ride on my site.
But all these suppositions rest on my ability to weed out my spam. Er, (cough) the comments area. That’s a lot of work my spam folder is dragging down my day with. My worry used to be that there might be a genuine comment and now it doesn’t matter. The sheer time necessitated to be spent on deleting junk comments from my blogs makes me want to report these spam comment sites somewhere. But where?
Continue Reading